This piece traces five individuals whose actions converged toward one outcome in the 2024 election: a far-right takeover of American politics. Racism, xenophobia, and misogyny are the ties that bind them.
But first, the electronic election equipment companies—privately held and embedded in a far-right ecosystem since the 1970s.
There’s a district in New York, Ramapo 35, that logged zero votes for Kamala Harris in 2024—but that wasn’t even half the story. Diane Sare, another candidate in the race, was missing votes too, and election equipment was drawing blame for glitches reported nationwide throughout the 2024 election.
Those glitches led to the discovery of last-minute engineering change orders (ECOs) affecting ES&S equipment in the months leading up to the 2024 election. The changes had been approved by Pro V&V—one of only two federally accredited testing laboratories—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.
These changes were labeled “de minimis,” a term intended for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified files—and were rubber-stamped with no meaningful oversight.
More disturbing still: although this particular update was said to affect only EVS 6.5.0.0, this method of approving “de minimis” ECOs has been standard practice for decades.
But to understand how election equipment companies came to make these kinds of changes with virtually no oversight, we need to go back to where the story began.
In 1979, the company that would eventually become ES&S narrowly escaped charges in a Justice Department investigation—an inquiry that ended following a change in administrations in Washington.
As company president David L. Dunbar later put it:
“I used to kid people we had to get Ronald Reagan elected to get this thing killed.”
He was right. In 1981, Reagan took office and the investigation was subsequently dropped.
In 1997, American Information Systems (AIS) purchased Business Records Corporation (BRC), eventually becoming ES&S. BRC brought its own history of controversy, including ballot-mishandling allegations in Texas.
AIS, formerly known as Data Mark, was founded by Bob and Todd Urosevich and financed primarily by the Ahmanson brothers, William and Robert, through H.F. Ahmanson & Co., which acquired a 68 percent stake.
Howard Ahmanson was a member of the Council for National Policy (CNP), a far-right organization with ties to influential conservative networks, including the Koch brothers, the Heritage Foundation, the DeVos family, Rebekah Mercer, Steve Bannon, the NRA, and Turning Point USA. He also helped finance the Chalcedon Institute, an organization promoting Christian Reconstructionism—an ideology advocating governance rooted in Old Testament biblical law.
Bob Urosevich later became CEO of Diebold Election Systems and developed core software used by both Diebold and his earlier company, I-Mark Systems. At one point, the Urosevich brothers held senior roles at two of the largest election companies in the country, effectively overseeing systems responsible for counting up to 80 percent of U.S. votes.
A few years after the Ahmanson brothers invested, the McCarthy Group also acquired a stake in the company.
In 1992, investment banker Chuck Hagel—a Republican who helped organize Ronald Reagan’s successful presidential campaign and who was serving as president of the McCarthy Group—was recruited by Michael McCarthy to become chairman of AIS. Hagel later stepped down to run for the U.S. Senate. He won decisively despite entering the race as a significant underdog against Nebraska’s sitting governor, and he carried several predominantly Black districts that had never voted Republican, becoming the state’s first GOP senator in 24 years.
The McCarthy Group funded Hagel’s campaign, and Hagel himself owned more than $1 million in company stock. These overlapping financial and political relationships raised significant concerns about ES&S and fueled scrutiny of the company’s overt Republican alignment.
As of 2025, ES&S is owned by M-One Capital, formerly known as the McCarthy Group. The Ahmanson brothers sold their shares to the McCarthy Group and the Omaha World-Herald in 1987, and in 2004 the McCarthy Group acquired the newspaper’s stake, becoming majority owner. At the time it gained controlling interest, McCarthy Group CEO Michael McCarthy had donated $28,750 to Republican candidates and none to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
This is yet another example of individuals aligned with a far-right political ideology maintaining influence over election-related companies.
Sequoia Pacific Voting Systems, meanwhile, carried its own history of bribery and political corruption allegations. The company began as Automatic Voting Machine, spun off to the shareholders of defense contractor Rockwell in the 1960s. Its founder, Lloyd A. Dixon Jr., resigned as president and CEO on January 10, 1973, and was later indicted by a federal grand jury in New York on charges of bribing Buffalo election officials, ultimately serving prison time.
The company was also fined nearly $50,000 for bribing officials in Texas and Arkansas, while its financier, Louis Wolfson, was implicated in a separate bribery scandal involving Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas—the only justice ever forced to resign in disgrace.
Taken together, these cases point to a broader pattern in how the election-services industry operated. Rather than competing, companies often acted in concert—buying and selling voting equipment among themselves to arrive at the prices they intended to charge states. The pattern bears a resemblance to today’s cycle of acquisitions and rebranding, where troubled companies and controversial technologies are absorbed, repackaged, and redeployed under new names, shedding the stigma of past misconduct while preserving the underlying infrastructure.
The 2025 Dominion Voting Systems-to-Liberty Vote transaction is a perfect example of this. Many of the remaining lawsuits were settled or dropped, while the election equipment remained in place, both physically and ideologically, within the far-right conservative ecosystem.
Then came the bribery conviction of Arkansas Secretary of State Bill McCuen, which revealed that ES&S predecessor Business Records Corporation of Dallas had arranged contracts involving Smurfit Packaging Corp. and its subsidiary, Sequoia Pacific Voting Equipment Inc.
Sequoia’s operations were further obscured through a network of front companies. Two Florida election executives, Glenn Boord and Ralph Escudero, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to compound a felony involving public bribery and operated a voting-machine company called UniLect, later identified as a front for Sequoia Pacific. Other entities followed a similar pattern: Pasquale “Rocco” Ricci’s International Voting Machines, along with Harold Webb’s Garden State Elections and Herb Webb’s Elec-Tec, were all linked back to Sequoia.
Webb—a New Jersey election-equipment executive implicated in bribery and kickback schemes that led to the conviction of Louisiana Election Commissioner Jerry Fowler—later played a role in the Martin County, Florida absentee-ballot controversy during the 2000 election. Companies he controlled supplied equipment to Martin County, and he participated in the recount process, raising questions about the absentee-ballot narrative later presented in court by Republican operatives.
Even where its name did not appear, Sequoia’s footprint remained. The company supplied both computer and punch-card systems, at times disguising its tabulating machines as those of other vendors. Systems linked to earlier controversies, including those used in Louisiana, resurfaced elsewhere through these overlapping networks.
Flori-Dub-Ya
The 2000 presidential election didn’t just unravel—it collapsed into chaos: hanging chads, unreadable ballots, a brother-governor with a vested interest, and, ultimately, intervention from Ted Cruz, his Kirkland & Ellis legal team, and a deeply partisan Supreme Court.
At the time, it was dismissed as a string of unfortunate mishaps. In hindsight, it was clearly engineered.
In 2007, Dan Rather aired an investigative report featuring former Sequoia employees who alleged the company had knowingly used substandard paper stock for Florida’s punch cards. Whistleblowers described being ordered to destroy evidence—including Boise Cascade labels that would have identified the supplier.
But as Caltech and MIT concluded in 2001, the hanging chads debacle was just a distraction from the real election heist.
“According to the comprehensive Caltech-MIT study, faulty and outdated voting technology together with registration problems were largely to blame for many of the 4-to-6 million votes lost during the 2000 election. With respect to the votes that simply weren’t counted, the researchers found that punch-card methods and some direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines were especially prone to error.”
Sequoia was also tied to networks connected to the Bush family. Its majority shareholder, De La Rue—at the time the largest shareholder in Sequoia—was owned by Madison Dearborn Partners, a private-equity firm with ties to the Carlyle Group, the investment firm that employed former President George H.W. Bush.
If the name Sequoia is unfamiliar, just think of them as Dominion Voting Systems. Because Dominion bought the majority of the troubled company’s assets in June, 2010.
The Tech Giant and the Judicial Kingmaker
Which brings us to Barre Seid and Leonard Leo.
Barre Seid, the 94-year-old reclusive billionaire, has one agenda: shifting U.S. politics to the far right. Perhaps that’s no surprise from a man who made his fortune in the data center and technology boom—forests and clean air have never seemed to be on his radar.
According to Census records, Seid was born in 1932 to Russian Jewish immigrants and grew up on Chicago’s South Side as the older of two brothers. Through his family foundation, he has supported the University of Chicago’s Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, and donated to the Heartland Institute, a Chicago-based nonprofit with a long history of challenging mainstream climate science and environmental policy.
Seid also appears to be the donor—listed as “Barry Seid”—who provided $17 million to fund the distribution of millions of DVD copies of the film Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West during the 2008 presidential campaign.
The DVDs were mailed specifically to households in battleground states and drew widespread criticism for their anti-Muslim content.
The origins of Seid and Leo’s relationship remain unclear, but public records show the two worked together through the Chicago Freedom Trust, a foundation Seid established in 2009. Leonard Leo later joined its board.
Then, in 2020, Leo’s Marble Freedom Trust was formed in Utah. As reported by ProPublica, its address is a house in North Salt Lake owned by Tyler Green, a conservative lawyer who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, the justice who was the deciding voice in the 2000 election decision and who set this entire far-right takeover of democracy into action. Tyler Green is listed in the trust’s tax return as an administrative trustee.
In 2020, Seid transferred his full ownership stake in Tripp Lite to it. At the time, Tripp Lite was a technology company and an approved vendor in the U.S. election ecosystem, with products integrated into over 70% of voting equipment used in jurisdictions served by both Dominion and ES&S across the country.
In February 2021, Tripp Lite filed its annual report with the State of Illinois, as it had for decades. This time, though, Seid’s typewritten name had been crossed out as an officer of the company. Written in by hand in its place: Leonard Leo.
Later that same month, Leo sold Tripp Lite to Eaton Corporation for $1.65 billion.
The transactions appear to have been carefully structured to maximize tax advantages. Under ordinary circumstances, selling a privately held company that has appreciated in value over decades would trigger substantial capital gains taxes. By transferring Tripp Lite to the tax-exempt Marble Freedom Trust before the sale, Seid avoided hundreds of millions of dollars in state and federal taxes—keeping that money inside Leo’s political and philanthropic network instead.
What emerges, then, is a remarkable sequence: Barre Seid, an elderly, anti-Muslim, racist billionaire, handed a technology company—ultimately sold for $1.65 billion—to Leonard Leo’s nonprofit trust, freeing an enormous pool of wealth for the political infrastructure Leo had spent decades building.
That infrastructure includes the Federalist Society network, which was responsible for the placement of the corrupt justices on the Supreme Court, as well as the judges in Florida and Georgia who ruled against the Constitution to pave the way for Donald Trump’s return to office.
The Antidemocratic Billionaires & Techbros
Which brings us to Peter Thiel and Elon Musk who believe—and have stated openly—that democracy is antithetical to capitalism.
Because that’s not all that’s interesting about the sale of Tripp Lite. The buyer, Eaton Corporation, is a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to already have a working partnership with Peter Thiel’s Palantir.
As we’ve learned from the Epstein files, Thiel had already dirtied his hands with election interference in 2016, colluding with Epstein and Russian operatives to rig the election for Donald Trump—something we wrote about extensively in this article:
She Won: How Epstein and Peter Thiel Colluded With Russia to Rig the 2016 Election
Feb 24
This Substack is reader-supported. For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
And now, with the 2024 election revelations, Thiel has fled to Argentina to raise his family under a dictator most likely to ignore extradition treaties—a government unlikely to extradite him. The choice seems pointed, given that he holds citizenship elsewhere, and that history’s most infamous fugitives once made the same trip.
Yes, we’re talking about the Nazis.
As for Elon Musk, we can back up to 2001, when he first floated the idea that the U.S. should pursue a better relationship with Russia, and forward to the 2010s, when “Putin’s favorite,” Representative Dana Rohrabacher, championed Musk’s satellite projects and helped clear his path into the space industry. In 2022, Musk launched his unsolicited bid for Twitter—at $20 billion over market value—just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag.
But if the return on that bid runs to $15 trillion in mineral rights tied to Ukraine losing the war, plus geopolitical deals Trump could greenlight, then the purchase wasn’t a financial loss—it was leverage.
Musk went on to reinstate Trump’s account on Twitter and reshape the platform into what read, by the 2024 campaign, like a pro-Russia, pro-Trump engine for Trump’s run for office.
Enter the Fifth
Which brings us to Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal article from October 2024 reporting that Musk had been in regular contact with Putin for more than two years.
Meaning that if Musk didn’t pull off the crime of the century, he’d be staring at the inside of a prison cell for a very long time.
In April 2024, Musk began hosting “billionaire brain trust” meetings that included Rupert Murdoch and Jeff Bezos, among others.
From the view at 10,000 feet, Musk bought Twitter and cut a deal with Putin to help get Trump reelected. And, as reported by multiple outlets including the WSJ, Musk shut down Starlink access during a planned Ukrainian strike on Russian naval assets at Sevastopol, and Russian forces have reportedly gained some degree of access to Starlink terminals as well.
That’s not just profiteering. That’s treason.
Now back to Tripp Lite, which to most was just a hardware brand selling battery backups, surge protectors, and power strips—on the outside, nothing for most Americans to be concerned about. But in America’s elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely.
They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers, across the country. And they aren’t dumb devices. They are smart UPS units—programmable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with election systems.
ES&S systems—including central tabulators and Electionware servers—rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.
Meaning if Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could gain root-level access to the host tabulation environment without ever modifying certified election software.
In Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as “optional,” meaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight.
In May 2024, Eaton resurfaced with an announcement that escaped most headlines: Eaton was deepening its partnership with Peter Thiel’s Palantir Technologies. Also of note, in May 2024, Peter Thiel funded Polymarket.
Let’s be clear, Palantir wasn’t brought in for customer service. It was brought in to do what it does best: manage, shape, and secure vast streams of data—quietly. According to Eaton’s own release, Palantir’s role would include:
- AI-driven oversight of connected infrastructure
- Automated analysis of large datasets
- And—most critically—“secure erasure of digital footprints”
The Digital Janitor, also known as forensic sanitization, could now be embedded into Eaton-managed hardware connected directly to voting systems. Meaning Palantir didn’t change the votes. It helped ensure you’d never prove it if someone else did.
Then came the final public breadcrumb:
In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk. The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on “grid resilience” and “next-generation communications.”
But buried in the partnership documents was this line:
“Exploring integration with Starlink’s emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.”
On October 4, Republican-linked Chain Bridge launched its IPO. Reuters notes the considerable risks if Republican electoral fortunes change.
And given what we’ve learned about Rupert Murdoch and his participation in Musk’s “billionaire brain trust” meetings, the $787 million check cut to Dominion Voting Systems looks less like a settlement and more like a payoff.
New York Times Article, May 31, 2025
Lasers From Space
Elon Musk makes no secret of the fact that his companies were under investigation, even writing in a text message: “There are at least half a dozen initiatives of significance to take me down… the Biden administration views me as the #2 threat after Trump.”
Whether that claim was true or merely inflated grandiosity isn’t the issue. The point is that Musk believed it, and that belief speaks directly to motive for stealing an election.
And we’d be remiss if we failed to point out that Musk’s purported reason for supporting Trump—political violence and the shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania—was a lie.
He filed the paperwork for his America PAC in May 2024 and, according to his former girlfriend, had been working on efforts to support Trump long before his public announcement of support in July.
Then, according to New York Times reporting, on October 5—just before Starlink’s DTC activation—Musk texted his former girlfriend, Ashley St. Clair:
“I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.”
Then, an hour later:
“This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.”
It read like a riddle.
One that left his former girlfriend asking how Elon Musk had access to real-time delta vote metrics.
In hindsight, it was a blueprint.
Then, on October 30, 2024—just days before the election—Musk activated 265 brand-new low-Earth-orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network.
DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, unsecured auxiliary hardware, and any equipment meant for transmission within the election reporting pipeline.
This includes the system of record and companies such as DDHQ as potential targets for election malfeasance.
From that moment on:
- Commands could be sent from orbit
- Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
- Vulnerable systems could be triggered remotely
This groundbreaking satellite infrastructure, which should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months.
Why the rush, and at what cost? Experts estimate that Musk shelled out at least double what it would have cost to build this low-Earth-orbit DTC satellite infrastructure on such a short timeline.
On July 22, 2024—Musk announced completion of the Memphis supercomputer needed for the new DTC constellation in an astonishing 19-day timeline.
19 days.
Why did this project have to be completed so quickly?
What else happened on October 30?
- October 30, 2024 — Chain Bridge shares surge to more than three times their average trading volume.
- October 30, 2024 — Peter Thiel’s Polymarket predicts the exact outcome of the presidential election.
Reuters alluded to the financial risk of the Chain Bridge IPO for Republicans if their fortunes were to go sideways.
Now compound that with the surge in volume on October 30, along with the Polymarket prediction, and what we have is a group of Republicans who knew the election was rigged six days before the election and that it tied to Musk’s new low-Earth-orbit DTC satellites launched and activated on October 30, 2024.
The Motive
The usual suspects: greed, power, exorbitant wealth.
But it doesn’t end there. No, there’s a much darker side to all of this that the election whistleblowers warned us about in July 2024:
“In December 2024, I was personally involved in an NSA-authorized forensic audit of the 2024 election. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz won—by a wide margin. Trump lost dramatically. There are multiple layers of complexity to this cover-up, including transnational organized crime syndicates that extend far beyond the United States and our elections. To that point, I work in the human trafficking sector, which intersects with the stolen election(s) and has ties to Trump and Epstein—not to President Biden, Vice President Harris, or Governor Walz, but to the Democrats and other allied interests responsible for burying the audit.” — Adam Zarnowski, former CIA agent and author of Jörmungandr
In December, when the DOJ finally released three million of the Epstein files, we learned exactly what the whistleblowers were telling us was true.
The men who run the world are in the Epstein files, and they couldn’t risk a Kamala Harris DOJ coming into power. Larry Ellison has spent the last year buying up the media not already owned by Rupert Murdoch; his son David is in the Epstein files.
Timothy Mellon donated roughly $150 million to the Trump campaign; Matthew Mellon is in the Epstein files along with revelations about an underaged girl.
The election whistleblowers stated that an NSA-authorized audit showed Kamala Harris won the election, but that the findings were buried to protect wealthy pedophiles on both sides of the political aisle from a Harris DOJ.
The billionaires in the Epstein files are some of the people being protected—their names are in the Epstein-related documents, reporting, litigation, contact books, flight logs, and associated records:
Business & Technology
- Donald Trump (Trump Organization)
- Peter Thiel (Palantir, Founders Fund, billionaire)
- Elon Musk (Tesla, SpaceX, X, billionaire)
- Mark Zuckerberg (Meta/Facebook, billionaire)
- Les Wexner (L Brands, billionaire)
- Mortimer Zuckerman (U.S. News & World Report, billionaire)
- Leon Black (Apollo Global Management, billionaire)
- Josh Harris (Apollo Global Management, billionaire)
- Jes Staley (Barclays, JPMorgan)
- David Ellison (Skydance, Oracle family, billionaire)
- Paul Mellon (BNY Mellon, billionaire)
- Matthew Mellon (BNY Mellon, billionaire)
- Sergey Brin (Google, billionaire)
- Glen Dubin (Highbridge Capital, billionaire)
- Gordon Getty (Getty Oil, billionaire)
- Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn, billionaire)
- Bill Gates (Microsoft, billionaire)
- Nathan Myhrvold (Microsoft, Intellectual Ventures)
- Boris Nikolic (Gates Foundation)
- Ronald Lauder (Estée Lauder, billionaire)
- Dean Kamen (Segway, DEKA)
- Steve Tisch (Loews Corporation, NY Giants, billionaire)
- Todd Boehly (Eldridge Industries, LA Lakers, billionaire)
- Brad Karp (Paul Weiss)
- Brock Pierce (Tether, crypto ventures, billionaire)
- Thomas Pritzker (Hyatt Hotels, billionaire)
- Adam Back (Blockstream, billionaire)
- David Rockefeller (Chase Manhattan Bank, billionaire)
Given the enormous wealth and influence these figures wield, it’s clear why both parties are protecting them—and why the Supreme Court, along with courts in Georgia and Florida, did everything in their power to clear the path for Trump in 2024.
Government & Politics
- Steve Bannon (Trump strategist)
- Lawrence Summers (former U.S. Treasury Secretary, Harvard)
- Gary King (former New Mexico attorney general)
- Bill Richardson (former New Mexico governor, former U.N. ambassador)
- Albert Bryan (Governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands)
- George J. Mitchell (former Senate Majority Leader)
- John Phelan (U.S. Secretary of the Navy)
- Howard Lutnick (U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Cantor Fitzgerald)
- William J. Burns (CIA Director)
- Bill Barr (former AG, H.W. Bush & Trump)
- Matthew Menchel (federal prosecutor)
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services)
- Tom Barrack (U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, Colony Capital)
- Bill Clinton (former U.S. President)
- Kathryn Ruemmler (former White House Counsel)
- Ken Starr (former independent counsel)
- Doug Band (Clinton aide, Teneo)
Foreign Figures
- Ehud Barak (former Israeli Prime Minister)
- Ariane de Rothschild (Edmond de Rothschild Group, billionaire)
- Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew, Duke of York)
- Vitaly Churkin (Russian Ambassador to the United Nations)
- Sergei Belyakov (Russian government official)
- Peter Mandelson (former UK Labour cabinet minister)
- Thorbjørn Jagland (former Norwegian Prime Minister, Council of Europe)
- Andrés Pastrana Arango (former President of Colombia)
- Miroslav Lajčák (former President of the UN General Assembly)
- Mohammed bin Salman (Saudi Crown Prince)
- Jack Lang (former French Minister of Culture)
- Mette-Marit (Norwegian royal family)
- Jean Pigozzi (businessman, billionaire heir)
- Hardeep Singh Puri (Indian cabinet minister and former diplomat)
- Terje Rød-Larsen (Norwegian diplomat, Oslo Accords)
- Kevin Rudd (former Australian Prime Minister)
- Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem (DP World chairman and CEO, billionaire)
- Børge Brende (World Economic Forum president)
There are 27 billionaires in the Epstein files—at least 27. Ellie Leonard will let us know if we missed any.
And those are just the ones we know of. We’re still waiting on the release of the remaining 45 terabytes’ worth of files from the Manhattan raid. That’s roughly 100 million files; we’ve only been granted access to three million, and those were redacted.
Transcript from election whistleblower #3 conversation:
TWH: “Are you willing to go public with your team’s findings?”
WB: “Public testimony would need to occur after the rightful president is in office, but yes, of course. Or a member on the team; we have several who can speak to the intricacies.”
TWH: “Intricacies such as…?”
WB: “Why Gelsinger’s exit happened when it did; the CBS sale; why JP Morgan funded Epstein; Lindsey Graham’s October 2024 visit with Oracle in Israel; the NSO Group activity that led to the WhatsApp case; and the subsequent series of rulings not involving Meta or OpenAI.”
TWH: “All of which is tied to the 2024 election?”
WB: “Yes. And the Epstein files. It’s not just ‘the Epstein list’—it’s a decades-long effort with multiple layers. Check out his [Epstein’s] travel, October through early November 2016. And again, note Sen. Graham’s early October 2024 visit to Israel.”
TWH: “That date looks off… Was it the following week? If the Epstein files and breach logs were released, wouldn’t that clean the system out?”
WB: “You’re probably right on the date. Clean? How much of the world economy is managed by very few people? ‘Cataclysm’ comes to mind.”
TWH: “So much of what they’re doing is unconstitutional. Crimes against humanity are on the rise across the globe. Who has proof of the NSA-authorized audit, and why are they sitting on it?”
WB: “Constiwhat? Think about the players involved and ask yourself that question again. Multiple individuals have the data. I’ll be traveling; I need to be where the banks aren’t controlled by JPM.”
TWH: “Would the data shore up the November numbers?”
WB: “Yes. It’s 100% Pentagon-certified that she won.”
It’s 100% Pentagon-certified that she won.
So many men with so much to hide.
They couldn’t afford to risk butting heads with a Kamala Harris DOJ, so the NSA-authorized audit of the 2024 election was buried to protect the wealthy donors to both parties who were named in the Epstein files.
The Foreign Election Interference Plot Thickens
Then another whistleblower stepped forward this month to add context and a foundation to Ashley St. Clair’s revelation that Elon Musk had access to real-time delta vote metrics. Vincent Reed didn’t go looking for any of this. He was brought in through a door that looked like opportunity, and by the time he saw what was behind it, leaving had become its own kind of danger.
Reed’s story deserves its own telling. You can read the full article here:
Tech Whistleblower: The UAE Colluded With Elon Musk to Interfere In the 2024 Election
·
Jun 6
Vincent Reed didn’t go looking for any of this. He was brought in through a door that looked like opportunity, and by the time he saw what was behind it, leaving had become its own kind of danger.
Vincent Reed exposed the Trump campaign colluding with the UAE to interfere in the 2024 election, and he brought documents to verify the coordination of Aleria Technology and Trump campaign insiders. Their response, if the deal didn’t go through, was that they’d tap Elon Musk.
All of this was corroborated by former Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, who personally hand-delivered Reed’s documentation to the FBI.
Let’s be clear about what this is. A foreign entity—operating under the direct influence of a UAE intelligence apparatus—approached the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign with technology explicitly designed to manipulate American voters at scale.
They had a preferred candidate. They had a backup plan. They had a blueprint. And they had access.
What Vincent Reed witnessed and documented is not a conspiracy theory. It is foreign interference in a U.S. election—the precise threat every American intelligence agency has warned about for decades—and it has been met with silence.
The Outcome
Data that makes no statistical sense.
A clean sweep in all seven swing states. The fall of the “Blue Wall.” Eighty-eight counties flipped red—not one flipped blue. Every victory landed just above the threshold to trigger an automatic recount.
The odds of that occurring naturally are approximately 1 in 50 octillion.
Yes, you read that right.
About 1 in 5 × 10²⁸—a 1 followed by 28 zeroes:
1 in 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
The chances of a candidate flipping all 88 counties red and winning all seven swing states just above the mandatory recount thresholds while receiving less than 50 percent of the vote are so minuscule they effectively round down to zero—at least in any world governed by math rather than “magic.”
Donald Trump supposedly outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seen, while Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas.
If one were to accept these results at face value, Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon and adjudicated sexual predator, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan.
According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance:
“These anomalies didn’t happen nationwide. They didn’t even happen across all voting methods—this just doesn’t reflect human voting behavior.”
And the supposed explanation from the DNC?
“Her policies were unpopular.”
Let’s think this through logically. We’re supposed to believe that, in all the battleground states, Democratic Party voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris’s platform that they voted blue down ballot—but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket?
Is anyone with a lick of common sense actually buying this narrative? Especially when, despite low turnout at his rallies and Craigslist ads placed to pay attendees, Trump told his supporters that he didn’t need their votes because he was being told he already had all the votes he needed.
Told by whom? Elon Musk? Why?
These are questions Congress should have been asking under oath in 2024. They should have been asking them in 2025.
And they should be asking them now.
Then, in November 2025, we discovered the fake county vote banks across the swing states and Florida and proved the use of a fixed variable, known ahead of time, to manipulate the election in Florida, Michigan, and Georgia.
How Did 6 Million People Vote In Burke County, Florida—When It Doesn't Exist?
November 24, 2025
This Substack is reader-supported. For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
What caught our attention wasn’t any single state. It was the repetition of the same pattern: a fixed variable appearing within the reporting data that appeared to be connected to a larger reporting structure.
- In Florida, the figure stored in the fake county precisely matched the combined number of Republican and Democratic early voters.
- In Michigan, the figure stored in the fake county precisely matched the number of permanent mail-in voters.
- In Georgia, the figure stored in the fake county precisely matched the number of voters who requested mail-in ballots.
It was a data swap. The real votes for Harris were removed and swapped out for a curated dataset with Trump at the top of the ticket. Which is why it appears that voters chose blue down ballot, then flipped to Trump.
“Just vote this one time… in four years we’ll have it fixed so good you’re not going to have to vote again…”
Elon Musk left the Mar-a-Lago election watch party early. He told his then-girlfriend, Ashley St. Clair, that he knew the outcome hours before—he said his team had the best real-time data.
Because it was the data he created.
Blue states will “totally disappear off the map” next year, Trump has a “big, big surprise.” — Donald Trump, Feb 2025
We should have been in the streets, protesting.
We should BE in the streets protesting now.
Why aren’t we?
Conclusion
What emerges is a picture far larger than a single election, a single billionaire, or a single political party.
We have an election-equipment ecosystem that has existed within a far-right political network since the 1970s—one that election-security experts, computer scientists, statisticians, and cybersecurity professionals have been warning Congress and the American people about for decades.
We have a transnational organized crime syndicate intersecting with a cabal of wealthy and powerful individuals whose names appear throughout the Epstein files, from David Ellison and Reid Hoffman to Leon Black and Jes Staley.
We have a media landscape increasingly controlled by a handful of billionaires, including Rupert Murdoch and Larry Ellison, who shape the information Americans consume and the narratives they are permitted to hear.
And woven throughout are relationships, financial interests, and geopolitical alliances tied to Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu that are anything but aligned with the interests of the American people or the preservation of democratic institutions.
Most disturbing of all, none of this exists in a vacuum. And it’s all being swept under the rug by both Republicans and Democrats because the individuals who fund both parties are the wealthy elites named in the Epstein files.
To recap the players in this piece:
- Barre Seid – a reclusive, xenophobic billionaire who transferred election-tied technology company Tripp Lite into the hands of Leonard Leo’s Marble Freedom Trust.
- Leonard Leo – a far-right, Opus Dei religious zealot, co-chairman of the Federalist Society and founder of Marble Freedom Trust, who sold Tripp Lite to Eaton Corporation, a company already partnered with Palantir.
- Peter Thiel – a racist, xenophobic, misogynistic South African tech billionaire with a working partnership with Eaton and fellow PayPal Mafia member Elon Musk who is now implicated in allegations of colluding with Epstein and Russia to influence the 2016 election for Donald Trump.
- Elon Musk – another racist and xenophobic South African tech billionaire with ties to Putin and a newly formed partnership with Eaton Corp. in August 2024, just before the election.
- Rupert Murdoch – a racist and xenophobic Australian media mogul who has been poisoning the minds of Americans and others around the world since the 1980s and who sat in on Elon Musk’s “billionaire brain trust” meetings beginning in April 2024.
Five people whose actions converged toward one outcome in the 2024 election: a far-right takeover of American politics. Racism, xenophobia, and misogyny are the ties that bind them.
We have learned more about government corruption, the military-industrial complex, the never-ending war machine, and stolen elections in the last 18 months than we ever wanted to know.
Donald Trump’s ties to Russian mobsters predated his 2015 campaign announcement by at least 30 years. Beginning in the 1980s, Trump Tower and several of his other properties became havens for Russian oligarchs laundering money.
He never should have been allowed to run for office the first time in 2016, much less the second, after orchestrating an insurrection on January 6 to stop the lawful transfer of power.
The Epstein files make one thing clear: our intelligence apparatus is compromised and serves to protect itself.
What we’ve uncovered is a decades-long transnational organized crime syndicate and a safety net established to protect the wealthy pedophiles in the Epstein files.
There was no way they could allow Vice President Kamala Harris, a lifelong prosecutor who never took a check from the other side of the courtroom, to rise to power.
She has always been “Kamala Harris, for the people.”
With Harris came her own DOJ, and turning a blind eye to a global cabal trafficking underage girls and engaging in blackmail in exchange for political favors and government contracts was not on her agenda.
The Solution
Accountability is coming.
We have constitutional avenues to remove this entire illegitimate administration, but those avenues begin with state-led investigations.
And we have to be willing to take steps not pursued since the founding of this country. Now that we have evidence from the Epstein files of collusion to rig the 2016 election, investigate and arrest all involved.
Roll back the clock and undo transactions that occurred under an illegitimate presidency, including the appointments of Supreme Court justices who never should have been seated and the decisions that followed.
Get Lina Khan back in there to bust up monopolies and swing that bat like a Roosevelt.
If there are grounds to arrest and prosecute Clarence Thomas and John Roberts for corruption, tax evasion, or other crimes, do it. If lying to Congress or other actions taken by the remaining justices can be criminally prosecuted, go for it.
Impeach the federal judges placed by Trump as well.
They are the judicial byproduct of an illegitimate presidency. The judiciary shifted toward blatant unconstitutionality to pave the way for Trump’s return. From Florida to Georgia to the grossly corrupt Supreme Court, it was clear to anyone paying attention in 2024 that Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society were returning Trump to office, no matter what obstacles stood in his way.
Do the same for the 2024 election.
The UAE may have set up shop in Minnesota, but its efforts were carried out across the country, meaning all states would have standing. Investigate the roles and activities of Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Eaton Corporation, DOGE, ES&S, Dominion, Pro V&V, DDHQ, and Amazon Web Services.
Investigators should also examine communications involving Barre Seid, Leonard Leo, Elon Musk, Rupert Murdoch, Jeff Bezos, and the billionaire strategy calls that began in April 2024.
Elections are being electronically rigged to benefit the top 5 percent, the military-industrial complex, Putin, Netanyahu, and the wealthy elites on both sides of the political aisle who like to rape children but would prefer not to go to prison for it.
Investigate and prosecute all of them.
Crime is crime, no matter the collar or robe.
It’s time for the people to reclaim our power. This is our government. These are our parks and lands. That is our White House.
We don’t want a fucking ballroom.
We want our East Wing back.
The East Wing that Teddy Roosevelt built and FDR expanded. The East Wing where First Ladies wrote their letters and Jackie planted her rose garden.
Nothing changes until pressure is applied. And pressure only works when enough people are willing to apply it.
Call. Email. Request meetings.
Go to their offices. Bring friends. Organize gatherings at their district offices. Show up consistently and make your voices impossible to ignore.
This is your right as a citizen, and it works.
Demand investigations.
Michigan
Contact Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office.
Call: 517-335-2436
Email: secretary@michigan.gov
Contact state Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office.
Call: 517-335-7622
Email: miag@michigan.gov
Wisconsin
Contact state Attorney General Josh Kaul.
Number to call: 608-266-1221
Email: https://joshkaul.org/contact-us
Pennsylvania
Contact state Attorney General Dave Sunday.
Number to call: 717-787-3391
Email: info@attorneygeneral.gov
Minnesota
Contact state Attorney General Keith Ellison.
Number to call: 651-296-3353
Email form: https://www.ag.state.mn.us/Office/Forms/ConsumerAssistanceRequest.asp
New York
Contact state Attorney General Letitia James.
Number to call: 1-800-771-7755
Email form: https://pcf.ag.ny.gov/form/CIVIL/natofcmp-voting
And hold on to your hope.
The Declaration of Independence gives us the right to remove a government that is no longer working for the people. It’s time we paid attention to what the founders sought to prevent and took their words at face value: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...”
This is not left vs. right—it’s all of us vs. the top 5%.
Again, we don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence.
We just need courage.
Onward.
Want the truth they’re not telling you? For fearless reporting and expert-backed research, read The Common Coalition Report. And if you believe in funding real, independent work—subscribe to our Substack or support our all-volunteer team here.